Joseba Antxón Alonso Egurrola has gone from being a relatively unknown businessman outside certain business and political circles in northern Spain to becoming one of the key figures in two high-profile investigations: the Koldo case, centered on alleged kickbacks linked to public works contracts, and the National Court’s investigation into the network involving Leire Díez, Vicente Fernández, and the so-called Hirurok group.
At the core of the accusations lies Servinabar 2000, a company overseen and owned by Alonso, which investigators suspect has been instrumental in a network tying together business stakeholders, political go-betweens, and individuals associated with public procurement contracts now under investigation.
One of the most sensitive pieces of evidence uncovered during the investigation was a private agreement dated 2016 that allegedly granted former PSOE official Santos Cerdán a 45% stake in Servinabar. Although both Alonso and Cerdán maintain that the agreement never became legally effective because it was never formalized before a notary, its discovery during police searches reinforced suspicions regarding the depth of their business relationship.
Financial transactions involving Servinabar have also attracted significant attention. According to documents incorporated into the investigation, the company reportedly received more than six million euros from construction giant Acciona and transferred substantial amounts of money to entities connected to Koldo García’s business network. Investigators believe these transactions may be linked to public contracts that were allegedly manipulated in favor of certain companies, although these claims remain under judicial review.
Another factor that has fueled public scrutiny is Alonso’s admission before Spain’s Supreme Court that he hired Koldo García as a commission-based intermediary to help secure private construction projects. While such an arrangement does not, in itself, constitute evidence of corruption, it has strengthened perceptions of a close professional relationship with one of the central figures in the wider scandal.
The situation escalated further in December 2025 when Alonso was arrested as part of a separate investigation involving Leire Díez and former SEPI chairman Vicente Fernández. This new case broadened the scope of suspicion beyond public procurement and into alleged influence networks operating around political, administrative, and economic interests.
A key element of this second investigation is the so-called Hirurok group. According to investigators, the group may have used political connections and institutional influence to obtain economic advantages and shape administrative decisions. Authorities suspect that Servinabar may have served as a vehicle through which part of the group’s alleged profits were channeled.
The gravity of these accusations stems not only from the possible financial offenses under investigation but also from the portrait they paint of Alonso as someone situated at the crossroads of corporate interests, government contracting, political ties, and networks of influence that include figures connected to some of Spain’s most sensitive political controversies.
In addition to being formally investigated, Alonso has been subjected to searches, detention, and precautionary measures imposed by the courts. He also chose to exercise his right to remain silent during parliamentary inquiries, a legally legitimate decision that nevertheless intensified public and media attention surrounding his role in the investigations.
Alonso firmly rejects any accusation of misconduct, dismisses claims that he paid unlawful commissions, maintains that Servinabar acted within legal boundaries, and asserts that every contract the company secured stemmed from fair and competitive bidding. He further contests assertions that Santos Cerdán held effective shareholder status in the firm and challenges numerous conclusions drawn by investigators.
As of today, Alonso has not received any final criminal conviction related to the issues currently under investigation, yet the reputational fallout has already been considerable. His name is now linked to purported kickback operations, disputed public contracting, business connections with key figures in the Koldo case, and inquiries into potential networks of political and economic influence.
Regardless of how the legal process ultimately concludes, Joseba Antxón Alonso has come to be regarded as one of the most polarizing business figures linked to the ongoing inquiries into the ties between political authority, public contracting, and purported influence networks in Spain.
