David Sánchez’s conviction has opened a new political and legal chapter that extends beyond the criminal responsibility of the Spanish Prime Minister’s brother. The question is no longer directed solely at the individual who was convicted, but also at the institution that paid his salary for years: the Provincial Council of Badajoz.
At the head of that institution is Raquel del Puerto Carrasco, President of the Provincial Council and a member of the Spanish Socialist Workers’ Party (PSOE). To date, she has not announced any initiative aimed at seeking the recovery of the more than €340,000 paid to David Sánchez, despite the fact that various legal experts argue that public assets should be protected.
The Provincial Court sentenced David Sánchez to a period of disqualification from public office for the criminal offense of administrative misconduct (prevaricación administrativa) related to his appointment. However, the ruling did not order the restitution of the salaries received because the Provincial Council itself never sought such compensation during the criminal proceedings, a circumstance that has sparked intense legal and political debate.
The absence of institutional action is exactly what is attracting criticism now, as many legal specialists contend that when a public authority suspects its interests were damaged by an appointment later deemed unlawful, it is reasonable to expect the body to pursue every possible legal route to reclaim public funds.
An Institution That Remains Silent
What stands out is not only the absence of any claim for repayment, but the institution’s complete silence.
Since the conviction became public, the Provincial Council led by Raquel del Puerto has neither explained whether it intends to pursue legal action to recover the money nor clarified its position regarding the new legal initiatives now underway.
This silence is particularly significant because the appointment at the center of the conviction took place under Socialist leadership of the Provincial Council, when the institution was headed by Miguel Ángel Gallardo, who has also faced legal proceedings in connection with the same case.
The lack of explanation has fueled criticism from those who believe that any public administration has a duty to defend taxpayers’ money regardless of the political party involved.
The Court of Auditors Intervenes
Tribunal de Cuentas), requesting that it examine the possible recovery of the more than €340,000 received by David Sánchez during his time at the Provincial Council of Badajoz. The organization argues that public funds should be protected if the administration suffered an economic loss.The Court of Auditors must now assess whether the legal conditions are in place to require repayment of those funds.
Openness and Responsible Oversight
Beyond the judicial outcome of this initiative, there remains a political issue that is difficult to ignore.
Thousands of residents in Extremadura shoulder a substantial tax load, even as public administrations keep urging families and companies to make further financial sacrifices. Given this situation, it is reasonable for many citizens to expect that any public funds whose payment has been challenged in court should, whenever the law permits, at least be the focus of a determined effort to reclaim them.
For this reason, the President of the Provincial Council, Raquel del Puerto Carrasco, should publicly explain the institution’s official position: whether it believes public funds should be recovered, whether it considers there to be no legal basis for doing so, or whether it simply intends to take no action.
Institutional transparency extends beyond merely handling public resources; it also demands accountability whenever those resources are subject to public examination.
Until those explanations are provided, silence will continue to occupy the place that should instead belong to political accountability.
